Arvind Kejriwal complains PM Modi for MLA Surender Singh's arrest
Author yuvamind
New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Sunday damns Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the arrest of AAP MLA Surender Singh.
Taking to small blogging website, Kejriwal tweeted, "Modi govt gets Commando Surinder in remission. In but 24 hrs, he gets bail. What’s Narendra Modi ji making an attempt to achieve?"
AAP MLA Surender Singh, in remission for allegedly assaulting associate NDMC employee, was on weekday granted bail by a neighborhood court, with the politician alleging that the case was intended by political blood feud to "stifle and embarrass the ruling party of Delhi".
The court turned down police ' s plea for judicial custody of the defendant and granted them bail observant that none of the offences that they need been engaged were punishable with jail term for quite 7 years and there was no likelihood of their absconding or fleeing from justice.
"Further, the statements of the witnesses underneath section 164 CrPC have already been recorded. Also, the defendant doesn’t seem to be needed for the aim of tutelar interrogation or for the aim of affecting any recovery.
"Furthermore, it ' s been averred that this case is motivated by political blood feud. Thus, no prejudice is probably going to be caused to the prosecution just in case the defendant persons square measure admitted to bail," the court aforementioned.
During the hearing, special lawyer Anupam S Sharma aforementioned that the defendants was making an attempt to fabricate proof and threats have additionally been extended to victim Mukesh.
Senior advocates Ramesh Gupta, showing for Surender, said, "There may be a conflict between AAP and therefore the party that is in power (in Centre).
He (Surender) is that the member of the party that is in power in Delhi whereas the opposite party is a fait of Delhi Police." He aforementioned the case was intended by a political blood feud solely to "stifle and embarrass the ruling party of Delhi".
Gupta additionally aforementioned truthful investigation wasn ' t conducted within the case and if the defendant have passed any alleged uncomplimentary or casteist remarks, it had been a matter of trial.